Case 002/02

On 15 September 2010, Nuon Chea and Khieu Samphan (together with Ieng Sary and Ieng Thirith) were indicted on charges of crimes against humanity, genocide and grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 in what is referred as Case 002 before the ECCC. The charges against them are specified in the Closing Order of Case 002. As Ieng Thirith was found unfit to stand trial, and Ieng Sary died on 14 March 2013, the two remaining defendants in Case 002 are Khieu Samphan and Nuon Chea.

In September 2011, the Trial Chamber decided to separate (sever) the charges in the Case 002 Closing Order into a series of smaller trials. The first trial in Case 002, referred to as Case 002/01 commenced on 21 November 2011, and on 7 August 2014 Nuon and Khieu Samphan was found guilty of crimes againgst humanity and sentenced to life imprisonment.

Case 002/02 refers to the second trial against Khieu Samphan and Nuon Chea where additional charges from the Closing Order in Case 002 will be heard. In a decision on 4 April 2014, the Trial Chamber decided that the following alleged crime sites and factual allegations will form the basis for Case 002/02:
•    Genocide against the Cham and the Vietnamese (excluding crimes committed by the Revolutionary Army of Kampuchea on Vietnamese territory);
•    Forced marriages and rape (nationwide);
•    Internal purges;
•    S-21 Security Centre; Kraing Ta Chan Security Centre, Au Kanseng Security Centre and Phnom Kraol Security Centre;
•    1st January Dam Worksite; Kampong Chhnang Airport Construction site, Trapeang Thma Dam Worksite;
•    Tram Kok Cooperative;
•    Treatment of Buddhists (limited to Tram Kok Cooperatives); and
•    Targeting of former Khmer Republic Officials (implementation limited to Tram Kok Cooperatives, 1st January Dam Worksite, S-21 Security Centre and Kraing Ta Chan Security Centre)

Trial hearings in Case 002/02 commenced on 17 October 2014, and the presentation of evidence started on 8 January 2015.

Indicted Person

Related Contents

Witnesses, experts and Civil Parties who have appeared in Case 002. Click on photo for larger version.

Mr. SEAN Sung Mr. SEAN Sung
Mr. SOS Romly Mr. SOS Romly
Mr. BAN Seak Mr. BAN Seak

Mr. BAN Seak, aged 61, testified how he was appointed as the Deputy Chief of Public Works after the purges of the North Zone cadres occurred. During his time as Deputy Secretary, So Soeun, wife of Ke Pauk, was appointed District Chief of the Chamkar Leu District. Being tasked with supervising the Lvea and Chamkar Andong villages, he was unaware of any Cham people living within the areas because they were forbidden to practice their religion. The witness was not aware about the fate of approximately 1,000 Cham families reported missing from the Chamkar Leu district. Mr. Ban, who lost two of his siblings during this time, reaffirmed that people were killed regardless of their race or religion. He was told by the district committee members that Nuon Chea acted as one of the key advisors on certain "policies". Mr. Ban said he had no authority to decide who would be executed; the orders came from the upper levels, and stated that no one was spared from the purges. If you opposed the regime, you were the enemy. He recalled seeing corpses, some in unknown military uniforms, floating down the Mekong near Trea Villiage. Some did not have heads.

Mr. SOT Sophal Mr. SOT Sophal

Rice farmer Mr. SOT Sophal, aged 51 at the time of trial, recalls his experience working at the Trapeang Thma Dam (TTD) worksite. He was transferred to the TTD worksite after being one of 2,000-3,000 children working at a Kampok Plantation. At the TTD site, he was part of the Special Children’s Unit assigned to dig and carry dirt, enough to meet the ever increasing daily quota. Working from 3am until 11am, then 2pm until 11pm, Mr. Sot states that if you didn’t meet the daily quota your food rations were significantly reduced. He saw workers fainting and dying because of too much work and inadequate food rations. Some people were also punished by being tied to wooden boards. He heard militia regularly stating “to keep you is no gain, to lose you is no loss”. He confirms that he would see people getting arrested to be brought to Ta Val, the alleged TTD chief, and states that the purpose of the arrests was re-education. He never saw the return of the arrested people. Some workers were publically killed to deter disobeying behavior; as a result, he fled TTD to the forest. He heard screams of people being pushed into pits by tractors.  

Ms. NO Sates Ms. NO Sates

Ms. No Sates, 57, was born and still lives in the Srei Klang Village, Srei Klang Commune. Srei Klang was at the time considered a Cham villager and, after a quelled rebellion, she and nearly three hundred other villagers were quarantined in a warehouse with no access to food or medical supplies. All were forbidden to speak Cham or practice Islam, and many died as a result of confinement and lack of access to vital resources. Ms. No stated that the Chams were targeted - especially men - and often taken away at knife-point, and that she lied about being Khmer for fear of execution. The Khmer Rouge tasked Ms. No and her fellow villagers with constructing a large dam and digging graves, during which time both of her parents died. She contracted dysentery.

Mr. HIM Man Mr. HIM Man

Mr. Him Man, a Civil Party, 66, was born and currently resides in Sauk Sau village in Kampong Cham. He stated that the Khmer Rouge viewed the Cham people as "enemy number one" and forced them to eat pork, cut their hair, and stop doing religious displays such as praying. Even if these rules were obeyed, many Cham people were removed from the village and executed by the Khmer Rouge The Civil Party said he had observed some of the killings while hiding in the bushes. Mr. Him said that he and his wife escaped persecution by hiding in a nearby pond for nearly four months before being captured and subsequently sent to a detention facility. Later, while he was aboard a boat ostensibly bound for execution, Mr. Him was rescued by the Vietnamese.

Mr. TAY Koemhun Mr. TAY Koemhun

Mr. TAY Koemhun testified that his house was 50 metres away from the Wat Au Trakuon pagoda, where he saw multiple people being directed four or five times per day. Men, women and children were led to the pagoda which played loud music; the older ones were tied up with rope as the younger children followed behind. The witness was not aware of the reason why people were being taken to the pagoda, but other villagers told him that they were being killed inside while the loud music was being played. The witness was tasked to harvest rice and had his life threatened twice by cadres. After the regime was over, Mr. Tay confirmed that Chams were no longer in his village.  


Mr. Samrit Muy, 68, was born in Kang Meas District in Kampong Cham province. He testified about the arrest of many Cham people in the Sach Sou village and their subsequent disappearance in the Au Trakuon pagoda. The witness was a worker at a rubber plantation in Peam Chi Kang until the B-52 bombings, and was later appointed to ‘Commune Militiaman’ in Sach Sou village, adjacent to Sambuor Meas village. The witness told the Trial Chamber about one large arrest where all the Cham people living in Sach Sou village, except for one family (that is a husband and a wife) that was arrested. This took place after the establishment of the so-called Long Sword Group by the Southwest group, as recalled by the witness. From a distance, the witness said he saw how the Cham people were taken to the Au Trakuon pagoda ‘to be killed’. Despite never having seen any killing, the witnessed assured the court that ‘those who were brought into that pagoda would never return'.

Mr. SEN Srun Mr. SEN Srun

Rice farmer Sen Srun, 67, was formally interviewed five times by the court at his residence in Kampong Cham. He joined the revolutionary movement in 1971 and became a member of Batallion 305, Zone 304, Section 30. Mr. Sen was ordered to return to his home village in 1976. Upon returning, he was arrested and detained for ten days, after which he, with the consent of his family, was arranged to marry a woman. He was sent to work in the mobile unit as a tree climber. Mr. Sen recalls a relative integration of the Cham and Khmer people in his village, although practicing religion, wearing Cham clothing and speaking Cham were all forbidden. A large scale purge of the mid-level to high-ranking Northwest Zone Cadres took place in 1976 and 1977 as they were subsequently replaced by Southwestern counterparts. Sen told the Trial Chamber that he was assigned to accompany the Long Sword Group - a militia group created to track down and arrest Chams. He explained that all Cham people in the two villages were arrested in one day, perhaps 200-300 individuals, and that he was tasked to lead the arrested people to Wat Au Trakuon. The next day, Mr. Sen was told by a cadre that the arrested Cham people had been smashed during the last night. In 1979, Mr. Srun was assigned as village chief, after which time he ordered the exhumation of several mass graves surrounding the village. 

Mr. SENG Kuy Mr. SENG Kuy

Witness Mr. Seng Kuy, 62, is a Khmer who described the treatment of  the Chams in Angkor Ban village number 2. He stated that after the Khmer Rouge soldiers arrived in his village in 1975, he was considered “a slave among other slaves.” He told that he was assigned to work in the rice fields. After the Khmer Rouge regime took the power, the Chams were brought into his village. Mr. Seng testified that the Chams did not practice their religion because they were afraid of the Khmer Rouge. In 1977, Mr. Seng witnessed the arrest of approximately 15 Cham people, which were executed by Mr. Run and his communal security forces. He added that he heard Mr. Run being referred to as a butcher.  Mr. Seng added that at the end of the Khmer Rouge regime, Mr. Run was killed by the people of Angkor Ban because he was the one arresting people. He added that he was one of the people assigned to transport the arrested Chams to the Au Trakuon pagoda. He was ordered to do this particular task by the chief of the Angkor Village; he was afraid to be killed if he refused. He testified that he never saw the arrested Chams again after leaving them at the pagoda.  

Mr. SOS Ponyamin Mr. SOS Ponyamin

The Civil Party Mr. Sos Ponyamin, 61, described the treatment of the Chams during the Democratic Kampuchea regime. He explained how the Khmer Rouge forbade Chams to respect their religion. Chams were forced to eat pork and were forbidden to fast and pray. Mr. Sos also revealed that they were prohibited to use their own language and women were forced to cut their hair. He told that if they would have opposed any of these principles, then they would have been accused of being enemies of Angkar. Mr. Sos stated that people were arrested without any reasonable explanations. His cousin told him that there was a plan to arrest 80 Cham s, and Mr. Sos organized a revolt with two other people. He explained that after the crackdown of the revolt, the soldiers took the Chams out of the village and interrogated and tortured them.  He also described the working and living conditions at the worksite. He stated that the conditions were the same for Cham  and Khmer people, and that he saw many corpses, but he did not witness any executions. Mr. Sos lost seven of his relatives during Khmer Rouge regime.  

Mr. IT Sen Mr. IT Sen

Mr. It Sen, 63, from the Tbong Khmum province, was the first Cham witness to appear before the court to provide testimony on the genocide charges against Nuon Chea and Khieu Samphan. He talked about how the Khmer Rouge soldiers forbade the Chams from practicing Islam, wearing their traditional clothing, and speaking their own language. He mentioned that those who were heard speaking Cham were taken away and murdered. He confirmed the Cham uprising that happened in Koh Pal Island and talked about how he and his co-villagers were forcibly evacuated to the Trea village after the soldiers cut off their food supply. Mr. IT eventually revealed that the Trea village was actually a detention and execution site where he witnessed the soldiers drowning people in the river. He stated that he escaped from captivity after he managed to pry a floorboard open, thereby giving him the opportunity to swim all the way back to his home village.  

Mr. MEAN Loeuy Mr. MEAN Loeuy

Mr. Mean Loeuy, 61, was a monk before the Khmer Rouge. He was urged to dis-robe, and forced to marry under the Khmer Rouge. He lost his new wife and many members of his family. He described how monks were described as “leeches” under the Khmer Rouge and shared how two of the kids from his family (aged 3 and 5) had their throats slit. He stated that his marriage was as part of a ceremony for 63 couples, many of whom could not recognize their spouses, as they had never met. He said that the couples spent a couple of nights together before having to resume work. The couples eventually lived separately but were allowed to do monthly visits. He said that he remembers his wife, whom he says he loved and could have been pregnant at the time of her death, by holding an annual Buddhist ceremony for her memory. He said that he only manages to escape the pain and suffering he experienced under the Khmer Rouge regime when he meditates and participates in religious ceremonies. 

Mr. SAM Sak Mr. SAM Sak

Civil party Sam Sak, 52, told that he was evacuated with his family from Phnom Penh on 17 April 1975. He was sent to the children unit in Samraong Commune to collect cow dung. He explained that later on he joined the mobile unit at Trapeang Thma Dam worksite since the food was better there than in the children unit. He stated that because of the workload he became sick but he still continued working.  He was scared of being accused of imaginary sickness. He explained that the Angkor had a phrase: if you could eat, you could work. He described the lack of food, lack of sleep, and unsanitary conditions at the worksite. He also told that people were arrested and killed.

Ms. NUON Narom Ms. NUON Narom

Civil party Ms. Nuon Narom, 59, testified on the living conditions at the 1st January Dam. The witness described how she and her family were evacuated from Phnom Penh on 17 April 1975. She was separated from her family and later on she was sent to work at the mobile unit of the 1st January Dam in January. The civil party stated that they had to work “day and night without any rest” to complete the dam before the rainy season. She described that they did not get enough food or clean water. She testified that workers were mistreated physically and mentally. She stated that the killing ended in 1979 and that she felt very lucky to survive.

Ms. CHAO Lang Ms. CHAO Lang

Ms. Chao Lang, 64, explained that she was in Siem Reap in 1975, but she was advised to go to Phnom Penh to find her parents and hide her biography. Whilst there, the Khmer Rouge took-over and she was separated from her parents. She stated that both of her parents were killed. Ms. Chao Laing stated that she ended up in a mobile unit, through which she ended up at the 1st January worksite. She described taking a day off, and discovering from that her sister, sister’s husband, and their three-year-old child had been killed, because they were in possession of salt, and were accused of being “white Khmer”. She broke down as she told how the “base people” had said that they were chained to an ox cart and dragged around the village. She also described her forced marriage, and that after the regime, she divorced her husband because his in-laws were not satisfied with her. 

Mr. NHIP Horl Mr. NHIP Horl

Mr. Nhip Horl, 63, a Civil Party from Battambang, testified how he fled his village after it was bombed by American fighters in April 1975. He provided details on how he was required to harvest and load sacks of rice into trucks despite his ailing health condition. He mentioned that he was eventually transferred to work at the Trapeang Thma Dam Worksite in 1977 where he was tasked to carry soil to build the dam. He also shed light on the post-traumatic stress disorder that he suffered from, the general health condition of the workers, and the overall work structure at the Worksite. 


Mr. Chhuy Huy, 58, was born in the Thmey Village and was a sector mobile brigade worker at the Trapeang Thma Dam Worksite. He stated that his task was to carry soil, and that each worker was required to carry two cubic meters of soil per day. He mentioned that the workers worked from 7 AM to 11 AM, had a break, and then continued working in the afternoon and sometimes even in the evening. Mr. Huy confirmed his participation in the meetings headed by Ta Val to receive guidance on how to best organize the work structure at the Worksite. As for the health condition at the Worksite, he mentioned that around four to twenty people would fell ill at any given time.  He was also questioned about forced marriages, the “illness” that caused his temporary removal from his position at the Worksite, and the arrests and killings that allegedly happened. 

Ms. YI Laisov Ms. YI Laisov

Witness Ms. YI Laisov, 57, testified on forced marriage and the working conditions at the Trapeang Thma Dam site. She explained that she was told to marry a man called Rhom. She added that the unit chief threatened that she and her family would be killed if she would refuse to marry. She testified that people who were considered to be lazy by chiefs had to attend self-criticism meetings. She also testified that Ta Val was in charge of the Trapeang Thma Dam worksite.

Mr. TAK Boy Mr. TAK Boy

Mr. Tak Boy, 61, was a former Lon Nol soldier who lived in the Trapeang Thma village as a member of the mobile unit after 1975. Mr. Tak Boy stated that he was afraid that his background would be revealed to Khmer Rouge; fortunately, he was not required to present his biography. He testified that workers were not allowed to sleep or eat enough. He stated that the water was dirty and that some people got sick. According to the witness, couples got married when both parties accepted the marriage. He stated that sometimes fifty couples got married at once. The witness described that whole families of Vietnamese and Cham were arrested, and that the husbands were separated from their families.   

Mr. CHHUM Seng Mr. CHHUM Seng

Mr. CHHUM Seng, 61, was a former Lon Nol soldier and a company chief in the Trapeang Thma Dam Worksite during the Khmer Rouge regime.  The witness described the arrests of the North-West Zone cadres and former Lon Nol soldiers. In regard to disappearances, Mr. Seng stated that two people disappeared from his unit and that he did not know where and how they disappeared since they never returned. The witness stated that they were monitored also during the night, and those who talked against Angkar were transferred into a different unit to be monitored. He mentioned a proverb that goes like “even a fish dies if it talks too much” to describe the situation. He also explained that the workers were made to marry each other according to their biographies. 

Mr. CHHIT Yoeuk Mr. CHHIT Yoeuk

Mr. Chhit Yoeuk, 67, described the authority structure in ector 5 as well as the conditions at the Trapaeng Thma Dam worksite. He stated that he was sent to work at the dam in April or May 1976 to fulfill the role of assistant to the chief Ta Val. He testified that he was afraid to be arrested and killed if he refused to follow instructions. He also mentioned that the workers were required to reach the daily quota of carrying two cubic meters of earth. Chhit Youk described the scarce food ratio and stated that half of the workers were emaciated. He testified that children also worked at the Trapaeng Thma Dam worksite and that he was instructed to monitor workers: “Anyone who opposed the regime would be reported to the regime.” In addition, Chhit Yoeuk described the arrests of the North-West zone cadres and the arrival of the Southwest Zone cadres.  

LAT Suoy LAT Suoy
LAT Suoy, 55, was a soldier in Battalion 513 of Sector 5. He served under Ta Nak as a guard at the Trapeang Thma Dam Worksite from late 1976, tasked with patrolling and controlling the dam. In his testimony, the witness talked about how workers that called to have problems with night vision were tested at the worksite. He also explained the tribunal how food rations were distributed, as well as the insufficient amount of proper drinkable water. Moreover, the witness spoke about the arrival of SW zone cadres to TTD and the takeover of the management of the dam by them. Additionally, LAT explained how North-West zone soldiers started to transport and hide weapons in the jungle, in order to defend themselves from the arrival of South-West zone soldiers. According to him, health and working conditions at the worksite were poor.
Kan Thorl Kan Thorl

Mr. KAN Thorl, 57, was a deputy platoon chief at the Trapeang Thma Dam Worksite. He started to work at the dam on February 1977. Prior to that he was part of a mobile unit and was considered as a base person. In his testimony, the witness stated that at the beginning he had 100 people under his responsibility, but this number was reduced up to 70 due to a series of relocations or people that felt sick and were taken to the hospital. KAN stated that the workforce at the dam was composed of 15,000 workers, most of them from sector 15. The witness talked about the living and working conditions at the dam, as well as the reduction of food rations when workers didn’t achieved their daily quotas for removing soil. He also told the Tribunal about the lack of medical treatment for those who fell sick. He also said that he was afraid of being taken away and killed, as he heard from other people at the worksite. According to him, those Vietnamese identified as such during the liberation of PP were taken away and executed.

Mr. OM Chy Mr. OM Chy

Mr. Om Chy, 62 or 63, told he was the head of a 500-person mobile unit at the 1st January Dam Worksite. He described the hard work conditions at the worksite and stated that no one was working voluntarily. According to Om Chy, if someone was inactive or lazy, he/she would have been reeducated. He also stated that anyone opposing rules was seen as enemy. Om chy stated that he heard people were arrested and taken to the security center Bagota.  He told anyone who was arrested never appeared again. The witness stated that in 1977 there was a plan to purge people, but he was not at the village at the time. The witness told he was relocated to work in other commune 20 km away from the previous village. He explained that when he came back his neighbor had disappeared. He also heard that 5 families had been purged. Mr. Chy also described that marriages were arranged according to the workers’ biographies.

Syndicate content

Stay connected




Latest news