Case 001
Case 001 was the first case before the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch, the former Chairman of the Khmer Rouge S-21 Security Center in Phnom Penh was the defendant in Case 001.
Duch was transferred from military detention and placed in provisional detention on 31 July 2007 by order of the Co-Investigating Judges. Duch was indicted by the Co-Investigating Judges on 8 August 2008, and the indictment was confirmed and partially amended by the Pre-Trial Chamber on 5 December 2008.
After an Initial Hearing on 17 and 18 February 2009, the substantive part of the trial commenced on 30 March 2009. The presentation of evidence concluded on 17 September 2009. The hearings before the Trial Chamber ended with five days of closing statements between 23 and 27 November 2009.
During the 72 days of hearing of evidence, 9 expert witnesses, 17 fact witnesses, 7 character witnesses and 22 Civil Parties were heard before the Trial Chamber. Over the course of the trial, the Chamber examines seven thematic areas of relevance to the proceedings: issues relating to M-13; establishment of S-21 and the Takmao prison; implementation of CPK policy at S-21; armed conflict; functioning of S-21, including Choeung Ek; establishment and functioning of S-24; and issues relating to the character of the Accused. Approximately 1,000 documents were put before the Chamber and subjected to examination. More than 31,000 people followed the proceedings at the court building.
On 26 July 2010, the Trial Chamber convicted Kaing Guek Eav for crimes against humanity and grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, and and sentenced him to 35 years imprisonment. His sentence was reduced by five years as a remedy for his illegal detention by the Cambodian Military Court between 10 May 1999 and 30 July 2007. He also received credit for time already spent in detention under the authority of both the Cambodian Military Court and the ECCC.
As for civil claims, the Trial Chamber admitted 64 applicants as Civil Parties and awarded the following reparations:
- Inclusion of the names of admitted Civil Parties and their deceased family members in the judgment;
- The Trial Chamber also ordered the compilation and publication of all statements of apology and acknowledgement of responsibility made by Duch.
The Accused and the Co-Prosecutors appealed the Trial Chamber verdict to the Supreme Court Chamber. In total, 41 Civil Parties, including 22 rejected Civil Party applicants, also filed appeals against the Trial Chamber’s decision on their admissibility and/or claims for reparations.
The Supreme Court Chamber held oral hearings in the appeals against the Trial Chamber's judgment in Case 001 from 28 to 30 March 2011. The Supreme Court Chamber announced its decision on appeals on 3 February 2012.
Granting the appeal by the Co-Prosecutors, it quashed the 35-year sentence handed down by the Trial Chamber on 6 July 2010 and sentenced Kaing Guek Eav to life imprisonment (the maximum possible term under the law). By a Supermajority decision, the Supreme Court quashed the decision of the Trial Chamber to grant a remedy in form of reducing Kaing Guek Eavs sentence by five years due to time he has spent illegally detained by the Cambodian Military. The Supreme Court Chamber also dismissed Kaing Guek Eve’s appeal in which he alleged that he was not within the personal jurisdiction of the court.
The Supreme Court stated the Trial Chamber had erred in law by attaching insufficient weight to the gravity of Kaing Guek Eav crimes as well as the aggravating circumstances in this case, and that too much weight had been attached to the mitigating circumstances.
The Supreme Court Chamber also granted the appeal from 10 civil party applicants who had been previously rejected by the Trial Chamber in the trial judgment. On appeal, these Civil Parties substantiated their applications and were admitted as civil parties in case 001. The Supreme Court Chamber also decided on appeals from civil Parties related to the Trial Chambers ruling on their requests for collective and moral reparations. The Supreme Court Chamber affirmed the Trial Chambers' decision to compile and post all statements of apology and acknowledgement of responsibility made by Duch during the course of the ECCC proceedings on the ECCC website.
Following the decision of the Supreme Court Chamber on 3 February 2012, which partially confirmed and amended the Trial Chamber Judgement as well as overturning the decision on sentencing, Kaing Guek Eav has been found guilty pursuant to Articles 5, 6 and 29 of the ECCC Law of the following crimes committed in Phnom Penh and within the territory of Cambodia between 17 April 1975 and 6 January 1979:
Crimes against humanity
- persecution on political grounds
- extermination (encompassing murder)
- enslavement
- imprisonment
- torture
- and other inhumane acts
Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949
- wilful killing
- torture and inhumane treatment
- wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health
- wilfully depriving a prisoner of war or civilian of the rights of fair
- regular trial
- and unlawful confinement of a civilian
A total of 36,493 people attended the trial and appeal hearings in Case 001 during 80 days of hearings. Duch began serving his prison term in the ECCC detention center in 2012 and was transferred to Kandal Provincial Prison in June 2013 to serve the remainder of his term.
Indicted Person
Press Release by the National Co-Prosecutor on the Passing of the Convicted Person KAING GUEK EAV alias DUCH
Statement by the international Co-Prosecutor regarding ECCC caseload
Kaing Guek Eav transferred to Kandal prison
Apology statements made by Kaing Guek Eav now available on video
Supreme Court Chamber orders declassification of over 1,700 confidential documents
-
Text Document [Redacted] Decision on Reclassification of Video Recording E3/247R and on Variation of related Protective Measures
F31/1
-
Text Document [Corrected 1] Decision to Re-Classify Documents on the Case File
F30/4
-
Text Document Decision on Guidelines for Reclassification of Documents on Case File
F30/2
-
Text Document Order Scheduling Pronouncement of Appeal Judgment
F26
-
Text Document Decision on the Defence Request to Appoint a Psychologist for Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch
E22/4
-
Text Document Decision on the Defence Request to Appoint a Psychologist for Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch
E22/4
-
Text Document Order scheduling the trial proceedings for the period of 20 to 30 april 2009
E48
-
Text Document Order scheduling the trial proceedings for the period of 20 to 30 april 2009
E48
-
Text Document Orders concerning the Defence Request to Appoint a Psychologist for the accused
E22/1
-
Text Document Interim Recognition as Civil Party - Man Malymas
E2/51/5
-
Text Document Interim Recognition as Civil Party - Penh Sokhen
E2/66/4
-
Text Document Interim Recognition as Civil Party - Romam Yun alias Khamphy
E2/36/5
-
Text Document Interim Recognition as Civil Party - Bun Srey
E2/65/3
-
Text Document Interim Recognition as Civil Party - Pann Pech
E2/63/3
-
Text Document Interim Recognition as Civil Party - Ly Hor
E2/61/3
-
Text Document Interim Recognition as Civil Party - Nheb Kimsrea
E2/64/3
-
Text Document Interim Recognition as Civil Party - Hoem Mom
E2/62/3
-
Text Document Interim Recognition as Civil Party - El Li Mah
E2/43/4
-
Text Document Interim Recognition as Civil Party - Sman Nob
E2/44/4
-
Text Document Interim Recognition as Civil Party - Puol Punloek
E2/58/4
-
Text Document Interim Recognition as Civil Party - Men Lay
E2/47/4
-
Text Document Interim Recognition as Civil Party - Beng Chanthorn
E2/55/4
-
Text Document Interim Recognition as Civil Party - Sin Sinét
E2/41/4
-
Text Document Interim Recognition as Civil Party - Chann Krouch
E2/59/4
-
Text Document Interim Recognition as Civil Party - Norn Kim Leang
E2/60/4
-
Text Document Press Statement of the Spokesperson of the Prosecution attached to the Kandal Provincial Court of First Instance on the Passing of Convicted Person Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch
F32
-
Text Document [Redacted] Decision on Reclassification of Video Recording E3/247R and on Variation of related Protective Measures
F31/1
-
Text Document Request for correction on document number F30/4.2
F30/4.2-Corr1
-
Text Document Request for correction on document number F30/4
F30/4-Corr1
-
Text Document Request for correction on document number F30/4.1
F30/4.1-Corr1
-
Text Document Annex C: Documents Declassified by the Order of 6 September 2012
F30/4.3
-
Text Document [Corrected 1] Annex A: Documents Re-Classified in Redacted Form by the Decision of 31 October 2012
F30/4.1
-
Text Document [Corrected 1] Annex B: Documents Re-Classified by the Decision of 31 October 2012
F30/4.2
-
Text Document [Corrected 1] Decision to Re-Classify Documents on the Case File
F30/4
-
Text Document Decision on Guidelines for Reclassification of Documents on Case File
F30/2
-
Text Document Co-Prosecutors’ Response to H.E. KONG Srim’s “Review of Confidential and Strictly Confidential Documents on Case 001 Case File”
F30/1
-
Text Document Review of Confidential and Strictly Confidential Documents on Case 001 Case File
F30
-
Text Document Request for reclassification of document E3/245 from Confidential to Public
E3/245/Corr-1
-
Text Document Request for reclassification of document E3/242 from Confidential to Public
E3/242/Corr-1
-
Text Document Request for enforcement of sentence
F29
-
Text Document Request for declassification of document E3/232 from "Confidential" to "Public"
E3/232/Corr-1
-
Text Document [Corrected1]Compilation of statements of apology made by KAING Guek Eav alias Duch during the proceedings
F28.1
-
Text Document Summary of Supreme Court Chamber Appeal Judgement in Case 001
F26/3
-
Text Document Case 001 Appeal Judgement
F28
-
Text Document Civil Parties admitted in Trial in Case 001 or Appeal Judgement
F28.2
-
Text Document Order Scheduling Pronouncement of Appeal Judgment
F26
-
Text Document Request for reclassification of document A101/III from confidential to strictly confidential
A101/III/Corr-1
-
Text Document Request for reclassification of document A101/II from confidential to strictly confidential
A101/II/Corr-1
-
Text Document Decision on group 1 civil parties' co-lawyers' supplementary request to admit additional evidence
F2/5/1
-
Text Document Annex 1: Proposal by the Ksem Ksan Victim Association for the Construction of an S-21 Victims Memorial at the Tuol Sleng Museum
F25.1
-
Text Document Transcript of proceedings in Case 001 - 14 July 2009
E1/48.1
-
Text Document Transcript of hearing on the substance in Case 001 – 15 July 2009
E1/49.1
-
Text Document Transcript of hearing on the substance in Case 001 – 20 April 2009
E1/12.1
-
Text Document Transcript of hearing on the substance in Case 001 - 20 April 2009
E1/12.1
-
Text Document Transcript of hearing on the substance in Case 002 - 10 August 2009
E1/60.1
-
Text Document Transcript of hearing on the substance in Case 001 - 13 July 2009
E1/47.1
-
Text Document Transcript of hearing on the substance in Case 002 - 09 April 2009
E1/11.1
-
Text Document Transcript of hearing on the substance in Case 001 - 05 August 2009
E1/58.1
-
Text Document Transcript of hearing on the substance in Case 001 – 21 April 2009
E1/13.1
-
Text Document Transcript of hearing on the substance in Case 001 – 09 April 2009
E1/11.1
Witnesses, experts and Civil Parties who have appeared in Case 002
Professor David Chandler